DODAF 2.0 VOLUME 1 PDF

Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Tojaramar Kabar
Country: Cyprus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 13 August 2013
Pages: 490
PDF File Size: 17.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.83 Mb
ISBN: 598-7-13068-539-8
Downloads: 43853
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardashicage

Retrieved from ” https: United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.

It voluke a basis for semantic i. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. While it is clearly aimed at dodaaf systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.

A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2.

There are many different approaches for creating an integrated doraf using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.

This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

In addition to graphical representation, there is volu,e a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.

Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. Commons category link is on Wikidata.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.

Related Posts  IC 74HC132 PDF

The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. These products are organized under four views:. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.

As the DM2 matures to doodaf the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision volime, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.

The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

DoD Business Systems Modernization: DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.

One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat In April the Version 1. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.

Related Posts  GURPS LITE 3RD EDITION PDF

The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF

The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those voume the operational framework into which it is set. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of vloume warfighter. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.

The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.

These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts.

The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

Views Read Edit View history. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.

These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction volumf other domains in which the system will operate.