Now the truth of this history will appear by considering the arguments on both sides. III. The arguments alleged for the testimony of the Three in. A Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend [Isaac Newton] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. An Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend [Sir Isaac Newton] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Published (Last):||4 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||11.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.77 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Et hoc quod super hac re Apostolico testimonio uteris divini testimonij ordinem rationemque furoris.
He wrote it there fore in the yearas Baronius also reccons: Austin is one of those many; as you may see in his third book against Maximus, where he tells us, that “the Spirit is the Father, for God is a Spirit: When his condemnation was sent him, signed by the emperor, he asked, whether they that had condemned him received the council of Chalcedon; and when they that brought him the sentence denied it, he replied, ” If Arians and Macedonians had sent me a book of condemnation, could I receive it?
Ships from and sold by Amazon. And if the authority of one of the four first general Councils make any thing for the truth of accounf reading, we have that into the bargain.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. For he wrote it before the condemnation of Nestorius in the council of Ephesus, as appears by the book itself. Posteaquam corru;tions concordiam inierunt cum ecclesia Romana, studuerunt et hac in parte cum Romania consentire. If, in the first case, it does not witness to men, to whom does it witness?
An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture
I hope this letter will to one of your inte grity prove so much the more acceptable, as it makes a further discovery then you have hitherto met with in Commentators. The shorter portion of Newton’s dissertation was concerned with 1 Timothy 3: Please try again later. For Cyprian in another place repeats almost the same thing b  “If, saith he, [one baptized amongst heretics] be made the Temple of God, tell me I pray of what God: At that time the Greek church had been long divided about the council of Chalcedon.
But victor is very uncertain in the years: I know not whether it be worth the while to tell you, that in the printed works of Athanasius, there is an epistle De incarnatione verbi, which reads 0eoq.
An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture – Wikisource, the free online library
And because Stephen had some of his various lections from Italy I will add that a Gentleman who in his travells had consulted twelve MSS in several Libraries in Italy, assured me that he found it wanting in them all. But to go to the original of the corrup tion.
And by the disciples of these two great men, it seems to have been propagated among those many Latins, who as Eucherius tells us received it in the next age, understanding the Trinity by the ” Spirit, Water, and Blood. Where the message gets changed and diluted as it’s passed around the circle by whispering into each others’ ears. And I have done it the more freely, because to You, who understand the many abuses which they of the Roman Church have put upon the world, it will scarce be ungratefull, to be convinced of one more than is commonly believed.
The first edition in greek which has the testimo ny of the three in heaven was that of Cardinal Xime nes printed at Complutum in Spain A. Having given you the history of the controversy, I shal now confirm all that I have said from the sense of the text it self. Legimus et nos in nonnullis Roberti nostri veteribus libris.
But on the contrary, for disproving it, we have here the tes timonies of Facundus, S. Cum enim de aqua loqueretur Jesus, quam daturus erat sitientibus, ait evangelista; ‘Hoc autem dicit de spiritu, quem accepturi erant credentes in eum. In another part of this Treatise lib 5. Deus scilicet nalusin carne, Deus visas in corpore, qui utique sicut palam est assumptus in gloria. The very same reading does Stunica also in his book against Erasmus note out of the Manuscripts he had seen in Spain, as was shewed above: Now the truth of this history will appear by considering the arguments histirical both sides.
Is it not fully evident that it is the Word of God the ffather? Thus Beza argues from Stephens book of collations: But this is not the main design. For do they not also see us? You see what freedom I have pf in this discourse, and I hope you will interpret it candidly.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Quid ergo magnum est illud sacramentum quod manifestatum est in carne? Add all three to Cart Add all three to List. Paul, 1 Timothy iii.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? And all this is further confirmed by Pho- tius, who, in his commentary on the epistles not yet published, relales that Cyril, in the 12th chapter of his Scholiums, read ” oc eavepand consonant to this reading is Cyril’s commentary upon the text in his explanation of the second of the twelve Off, where he puts the question, ” Quid est igitur quod dicit, apparuit in carne? Rough Draft Printing May 16, Language: After the fourth Paragraph ending with these words — ———[ in order to prove them one Hisstorical ,] add this Paragraph.
The words in terra he omits, which is never done but in copies where the testimony of the three in heaven is wanting. So in the Apocalypse xix. And by scripturd best enquiry that I have been able to make it is wanting in the ma nuscripts of all Languages but the Latine.
Again, in the Apocalypse xxi. In reconciling this difficulty I consider therefore that the only words of the text quoted by Cyprian in both places are, And these three are one: But the words ut appareret not being in Li. AmazonGlobal Corruptionss Orders Internationally. Certainly Atha nasius was not its Author. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.
And yet I meet with nothing of this kind in history.