Donor challenge: Your generous donation will be matched 2-to-1 right now. Your $5 becomes $15! Dear Internet Archive Supporter,. I ask only. The New Chronology is a pseudohistorical theory which argues that the conventional . In volumes 1, 2, 3 and 4 of History: Fiction or Science?, Fomenko and his . In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his. This series crowns 30 years of research by Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. In Chapter I readers are Mithec, – Chronology, Historical – pages.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||19.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
New Chronology (Fomenko) – Wikipedia
Sience book contains graphs and illustrations, list of sources, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays. Not since the release of the first volume in seven of History Fiction or Science? He found a leap in the interval of the 5th to 10th century. Authentic history only begins in XVII century a d.
Customers who bought this item also bought. There are symbols allowing for astronomical interpretation and the symbols do not change from one temple horoscope to another.
History Fiction or Science? Chronology 1
Fomenko lists a number of pairs of unrelated dynasties — for example, dynasties of kings of Israel and emperors of late Western Roman Empire AD — and claims that this method demonstrates correlations between their reigns.
One way or another, the understanding of the astronomical descriptions that the Apocalypse contains got lost at some point. In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his coauthor Gleb Nosovsky were awarded for their books on “New Chronology” the anti-prize called “Abzatz” literally ‘paragraph’, a Russian slang word meaning ‘disaster’ or ‘fiasco’ in the gomenko “Pochotnaya bezgramota” the term is a pun upon “Pochotnaya gramota” Certificate of Honor and may be translated either “Certificate of Dishonor” or literally, “Respectable Illiteracy” for the worst book published in Russia.
The majority of scientific commentators consider The New Chronology to be pseudoscientific.
History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology 1) by A.T. Fomenko
The worst case of cherry picking Ive seen in a longtime. Another possibility is that there was an unspoken general taboo on what concerned a subject quite as dangerous, which resulted fcition the misdating of the Apocalypse.
I’ve read his paper on the anomaly of a parameter in the moons orbit assuming an uncorrected calendar – curious if any astronomer has critiqued his argument. Worldcat source edition Consequently, the scientists Dr.
Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. The New Chronology is rejected by mainstream historians and is inconsistent with absolute and relative dating techniques used in the wider scholarly community. Polk rated it it was amazing May 02, Please help to clean it up to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway.
On the other hand, according to Fomenko the word “Rome” is a placeholder and can signify any one of several different cities and kingdoms.
Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: The Mongol Empire and Ivan the Terrible”. A unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenvironment reconstructions” Radiocarbonvol.
Fomenko’s research does not in fact provide a new understanding of history for me, a new veil to adopt as reality. The theory provides an alternate history account of the “true” history centered around a world empire called the “Russian Horde”. The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists and scientists in XV – XVII th centuries in creation and dissemination of fictional Ancient World served this agenda.
Critics of Fomenko’s theory claim that his use of historical sources is highly selective and ignores the basic principles of sound historical scholarship. Fomenko specifically points to a break of dendrochronological scales around AD What is the next streetlight that will show the ground beneath our feet and hasten us further on our journey?
Retrieved 9 October It is very difficult to digest the new version of history from Fomenko without getting allergic shock. Paperbackpages. Fomenko rejects numismatic dating as circular, being based on the traditional chronology, and points to cases of similar coins being minted in distant periods, unexplained long periods with no coins minted and cases of mismatch of numismatic dating with historical accounts.
Jakob rated it it was ok Dec 18,